True, seriousness is not always effective at the polls,celinebagsrose.com
, but shouldn t be dismissed outright.
In second place,http://www.celinehandbagsrose.com/
, Hugo Ch vez leaves among his cohorts a substitute for an ideological vision. Twenty-first-Century socialism is not an ideology, though Heinz Dieterich, its jolly German-Mexican theoretician,true religion Outlet
, touts it as such,celine handbags
. Instead, it is a surrogate composed of three noxious elements: anti-Americanism, anti-market policies and a rejection of private property as a way to generate wealth.
Of those three factors, the key one, the one that binds them, is anti-Americanism. Just as Hitler was convinced that all of humanity s ills derived from the existence and actions of the Jews, Ch vez, heeding Fidel Castro s guidance,"Tough ballgame. Had a lead
, lived and died fully persuaded that the White House was really Satan s lair.
That s the only explanation for his barefaced assertion that the earthquake that devastated Port-au-Prince was the result of a secret weapon tested by the Pentagon in Haiti s capital as a way for American imperialism to seize that country s wealth. How can anyone say such a stupidity and not be locked in a loony bin?Along with the intrinsic wickedness of the yanquis, there is the intrinsic evil of the private market.
According to Chavismo, prices must be controlled, so that the poor may acquire goods and services,County Road
. Multinational corporations are evil. Merchants are agents of imperialism. Economic freedom is a farce. Instead, equity resides in the good will of a legion of benevolent functionaries.
Ch vez believed all that and inoculated his supporters with these ideas. To him, a just society was possible only if a group of revolutionaries, led by a strongman enlightened by Providence or Sim n Bol var, which is the same, dictates the what, how and when of commercial transactions.
But, of the three legacies that Ch vez left to his executors to manage in a revolutionary manner, the third is the worst: neopopulism. That is, the notion that society should live from the output of the state,chanel bags 2013
, not the opposite, as happens in the world s prosperous countries.
It should be noted that,http://www.celinebagsrose.com/
, in the democratic Venezuela before Chavismo, there was a populist substratum fostered by supporters of Democratic Action, a Social Democratic party, and the COPEI, a Christian Democratic party the traditional political groupings.
Hugo Ch vez multiplied one thousandfold their wrong way of distributing public resources.
In his 14-year tenure, while more than 100,000 private companies folded and hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans chose to emigrate, the Bolivarian president created a welfare-patronage system based on granting subsidies and creating missions that distribute goods and services, generating a parasitic attitude in millions of people who,Trinidad killing was self-defense
, naturally, will vote for whoever props them up.
That accursed legacy will be very difficult to eradicate,truereligionrose
. The Argentines have not been able to do it in more than 60 years.