Maximum Grilled Steelers Forum
Oct 25, 2014 at 23:41 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
  Home   Forum   Help Calendar Media Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 7 [8] 9 10
 71 
 on: Oct 20, 2014 at 20:33 
Started by Finnegans Wake - Last post by Preacherman0
Quote
Mike Adams vs JJ Watt should be fun.

Actually, he looked pretty decent on a couple of plays. And that's more than I expected.

 72 
 on: Oct 20, 2014 at 20:30 
Started by Finnegans Wake - Last post by Preacherman0
Good grief, this is horrible. We even look bad making a drive.

 73 
 on: Oct 20, 2014 at 20:30 
Started by Finnegans Wake - Last post by jonzr
Did I just hear a PAP!?

 74 
 on: Oct 20, 2014 at 20:29 
Started by Finnegans Wake - Last post by Merman1983
Mike Adams vs JJ Watt should be fun.

 75 
 on: Oct 20, 2014 at 20:27 
Started by jonzr - Last post by Preacherman0
Yes, it's bad.

Actually, as I was watching The Manning last night, I was thanking the Lord last night that Pittsburgh won't have to see His Majesty this season.

 76 
 on: Oct 20, 2014 at 20:23 
Started by aj_law - Last post by Preacherman0
I'm not sure what the Steelers need more. A JJ Watt to play DL, or as a #2/TE.

 77 
 on: Oct 20, 2014 at 20:21 
Started by Finnegans Wake - Last post by jonzr
What does a Steeler TD drive look like?  Does anyone remember?

 78 
 on: Oct 20, 2014 at 20:14 
Started by Finnegans Wake - Last post by Finnegans Wake
So far, so fucking predictable.

Can't stop Foster, can't set the edge against the stretch.  Our OCs (Haley, Ben), calling insidiously stupid plays.  Criticize Wheaton, but Ben ain't givin' him shit.  Unless Wheaton's 12' tall he can't catch that.

I need to stab myself in the gut with an icepick every time the ball is hiked.

 79 
 on: Oct 20, 2014 at 20:12 
Started by Merman1983 - Last post by Finnegans Wake
Nice trip down memory lane.  Lots of familiar names, good and bad.  Still remember the hopes and expectations I had for every one of them. 

Have to say, I think this incarnation of the PS has more talent than the 2000 PS. 

Ben R. > Kordell (or, duh, Kent Graham)
Bell ≈ Bettis; thinking Bell's yardage total will come close to Bettis's in 2000, and Bell is ascendant, Bettis was in his 8th year
OL's approximately even, with Dawson > Pouncey, Faneca ≈ DeCastro at this stage, the OTs Gandy & Faneca > Beachum & Gilbert, and Foster > than whoever was the other OG (Myslinski, Tylski).
Hines < AB.  AT THIS STAGE IN THEIR CAREERS.  Hines had yet to reach 1000 yards receiving, and only notched 672 in 2000.  AB is far more productive, but we want to judge him NOW against the totality of Hines's career, which is unfair.
Wheaton, Brown, Moore vs. Blackwell, Shaw, Edwards:  probably the 2K crew, but I think Wheaton has huge upside and could skew this.
Miller >> Bruener.  I

 80 
 on: Oct 20, 2014 at 19:18 
Started by Finnegans Wake - Last post by pensodyssey
Yeah, if only we had a beast RB who could chew some clock for us.  If only.

Lendale White?

He said chew the clock, not deep fry and swallow it whole.

Pages: 1 ... 7 [8] 9 10

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal
| Sitemap
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!