Maximum Grilled Steelers Forum
Jul 24, 2014 at 01:43 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
  Home   Forum   Help Calendar Media Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [All]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Televisions  (Read 3282 times)
bamf16
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 1267
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,097


« on: Nov 01, 2007 at 17:52 »

So I'm a moron when it comes to this stuff, so hoping someone out there can make the lightbulb go off in my head so I know what to buy!

I want a bigger screen than my 27", that is an HD tv so when the HD stations become worth the extra $30/month I'd have to pay, I can seamlessly switch over.  Right now a lot of them are not simulcasted from the regular station.  I don't want to watch the same four hours of HD programming on a loop, so I haven't paid for the HD service through DishNetwork.

I don't want a tv that looks like shit when I'm not watching HD channels.  I don't want to trade 27" of good picture for 42" of shitty picture.  And what is "Over the air HD?"

What do rear projection sets look like on non HD channels?

The more I read, the more confused I get.  I've always found the best thing to do was to talk to people who have gone down the path I'm looking to go down!

Thanks.
Logged

No one wants to hear about the labor pains, they just want to see the baby.
--Lou Brock
otismalibu
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 7051
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,877



« Reply #1 on: Nov 01, 2007 at 18:25 »

I just spent the last month shopping for a TV. I'm certainly no expert and I did just like you - asked questions. Big Virgil sent me a number of helpful emails and I picked the brain of a friend who's an electronics guy.

The bigger the screen and the closer you are, the worse it seems non-HD will look. I just moved a 32" TV to the bedroom and replaced our 27". It looks a little worse than it did in the living room, because I'm not viewing from the same distance.

If you're close to the station transmitting the signal, you can get HD channels via a simply antenna (OTA - over the air). I'm about 20 miles from STL and can watch all the major networks in HD with nothing more than a $35 Walmart antenna sitting on the floor behind my TV. If you have an antenna connection on back of your set now, give it a shot with some cheap rabbit ears. You'll just need to do a channel scan.

We bought a 57" rear projection Mitsubishi. The HD channels look swell and the standard channels...well, not the greatest. I read somewhere that you take the screen size and double it for minimum viewing distance for HD, but you have to triple it for minimum viewing distance for SD. No sense getting too big of a screen unless you want to watch from the backyard for you standard channels.

I think the main 3 for big screens are plasma, LCD and projection. Technically, I think only LCD and plasma are considered flat screen and they cost more than the projection sets. But our set is only about 14" and weighs 75-80, so although it's not something you'd mount on a wall, it's not too bulky. Consumer Reports just ranked their top LCDs and plasma TV. They didn't include DLP/projection.

Hopefully everything I just spewed out is relatively accurate. If it's not, I'm sure someone will enlighten us both
 :D

***edit***

Couple more things. I went to a more upscale joint to get info from the sales guy. The zit faced dildos at Best Buy & Circuit City would certainly fall into Penso's cup stacking category. Get the info from someone with some knowledge and then shop around.

And you can haggle just like you're buying a car. It's your money, never feel uncomfortable about looking for a better deal. I got the guy at the nice place to match another price and throw in a free stand.  
« Last Edit: Nov 01, 2007 at 18:30 by otismalibu » Logged
Big Virgil
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 3768
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,244



« Reply #2 on: Nov 02, 2007 at 08:13 »

Quote
I think the main 3 for big screens are plasma, LCD and projection. Technically, I think only LCD and plasma are considered flat screen and they cost more than the projection sets

Let me clarify.  The three most prominent HD technologies are Plasma, LCD, and DLP.  Plasma and LCD come in flat panel displays (one you can hang on a wall).  LCD and DLP are the two main projection technologies.  They are all "flat screens", but wall mountable are "flat panel".  DLP, as far as I know, does not come in a flat panel variety.  The wall mounted flat panel sounds cool, but for it to look decent you have to run wires behind the wall for DVD player, Sat box, etc.  They do have stands, but if it isn't going to be mounted on the wall, why not go bigger with projection?  If it is monted on the wall, you need about a $300 bracket that lets you angle the TV downward for viewing while sitting.  Depends on the mounted height, but if it is on the wall, they are generally higher and need to be angled downward.

What Otis said about SD vs HD and viewing distance is accurate, IMO.

SD on a microdispay TV (the TV's mentioned above) isn't really bad, but if you are watching a football game in HD and switch over to one that is SD it looks absolutely terrible.  SD programming on a picture tube TV, doesn't look as good as HD.  So the real comparison is SD on an HD tv vs SD on a tube.  The tube is probably a little better, but not that much.  The mental block here is that people think that buying one of these TV's wil make all of their programming look like HD.  Well, HD is HD and SD is SD.  It is a limitation of the broadcast technology, not the TV.

Bam - not sure wht you are talking about HD costing $30 more per month.  The price for HD programming with DirecTV is $10 or $12 per month.  Don't know what DISH has going on, but DirecTV has had about 8 channels in HD for quite a while, but now have tons more, including 2 HD HBO's, A&E, TLC, History channel, Big Ten Network, NFL Network (although there doesn't seem to be any HD programming broadcast) and even a cartoon channel is HD.  There are others, but these are the one I can recall at the moment.

Also, as far as playing DVD's, you need an upconverting DVD player for the picture to look decent on the TV.  I think Otis got one for < $100.  You need an HD DVD player if you want movies in HD.  That is a whole separate subject.  I will be happy to expound what I think I know if you are interested.

If upgrading, you will need an HD sat box from DISH Network.  The satellite companies try to soak you for the equipment, but if you have been a subscriber for a while, or become a new DirecTV subscriber, you can get the equipment very cheap.
Logged

Looks like you've been missing a lot of work lately.
I wouldn't say I've been *missing* it, Bob.
bamf16
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 1267
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,097


« Reply #3 on: Nov 02, 2007 at 08:43 »

Quote


Bam - not sure wht you are talking about HD costing $30 more per month.  The price for HD programming with DirecTV is $10 or $12 per month.  Don't know what DISH has going on, but DirecTV has had about 8 channels in HD for quite a while, but now have tons more, including 2 HD HBO's, A&E, TLC, History channel, Big Ten Network, NFL Network (although there doesn't seem to be any HD programming broadcast) and even a cartoon channel is HD.  There are others, but these are the one I can recall at the moment.

 
Thanks for the insight.  I mistakenly wrote an additional $30/month, but it's $20/month for the HD package from DishNetwork.  I'm not sure how much more I'll pay each month to rent the box, but an additional $20-$30 month for HD packaging sounds about right.  I'm just not sure I want to pay it.

But in case I do want it in the future, I'd prefer to get an HDTV.  Are non HD channels better quality on a rear projection TV than an LCD flat panel?
Logged

No one wants to hear about the labor pains, they just want to see the baby.
--Lou Brock
otismalibu
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 7051
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,877



« Reply #4 on: Nov 02, 2007 at 08:53 »

I think the plasma & LCDs can be viewed from a number of angles and the picture still looks the same. With the DLPs, you'll want to be pretty much straight on. Not a biggy IMO, because who watches TV from the side or far above or below?

My cable company charges about $11/month for the HD box, but it's also a DVR. Not sure if they offer an HD box w/o the DVR. With that box, they offer 5 or 6 HD channels at no extra cost. If I pay out another $11/month I can get their limited HD lineup which has ESPN, TNT, A&E and stuff like HDNet.

I bought a Samsung up-conversion DVD player for $100. Then you'll need the HDMI cable as well. I found one at Sam's for $21, but you can spend quite a bit more.

Keep in mind, it's not like everything is in HD. I looked thru the CBS lineup one day and the only shows in HD for the day was a soap, 2 primetime shows and Letterman.

I actually find myself watching less TV now that we have the new set. Before, I'd turn it on a surf. But my TV takes about 15-20 to come to life and then I factor in how some of the channels look. IMO, taped programs look pretty decent in SD as opposed to say an NFL game. I recorded CSI last night and watched it and it still looks pretty good in SD. The NFL games in SD on the big screen don't look nearly as good as how they did on my old tube TV. But with the home theatre and big screen, the movie experience is so much better.
Logged
Big Virgil
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 3768
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,244



« Reply #5 on: Nov 02, 2007 at 09:33 »

Quote
I think the plasma & LCDs can be viewed from a number of angles and the picture still looks the same. With the DLPs, you'll want to be pretty much straight on

I really disagree with this.  I think they all have a really good wide viewing angle.  My wife and daughter (don't ask me why) sit on a love seat that is at about a 45 degree angle to the TV and there is no loss of brightness or clarity.  I do have a 1080p DLP.

Quote
But in case I do want it in the future, I'd prefer to get an HDTV. Are non HD channels better quality on a rear projection TV than an LCD flat panel

As far as SD goes, I think they are comparable.  For HD, if you do any gaming, or watch a lot of sports, a DLP would be the better choice.  If you watch more movies, and non fast moving pictures, LCD would be the better choice.

This is a fact, not an opinion, LCD has some lag (not immediate resposne) for playing games, and when watching football or other sports, guys running, and a footall moving through the air do not have a distinct/defined outline so the object has some blur.  The downside to DLP is that in low light movie scenes, or with something that is black and white (which is mostly low light scenes) you can see some rainbows in the picture.

1080i vs 1080p

Bam - if yopu buy something, I strongly suggest a TV with 1080p resolution.  Quick explanation, i=interlaced and p=progressive.  1080 means there are 1080 lines of horizontal resolution.  If a movie, or whatever is filmed at 60 frames per second, an interlaced picture refreshes all of the odd numbered lines 30 times per second, and the even numbered lines 30 times per second.  The picture is therefore interlaced.  Progressive is that all lines are refreshed 60 times per second.  1080p, IMO, has a more clear picture with a little better color.

DLP's were first out with 1080p sets.  The LCD's now have 1080p's out there, and that may reduce the blur and undefined outlines of faster moving parts of the picture.  I haven't been is the stores recently so I don't have an opinion on LCD 1080p sets.

A friend of mine, just bought a Sony Aquos, a highly popular LCD flat panel, and I want to say it is 42 inches.  He said the first thing he noticed watching a baseball game, the little blur factor.  He is pretty particular, so he said he was thinking about returning it.  I'm not sure if his is 1080i or 1080p.  He bought 2 other Aquos TV's (these are in his newly finished basement) and are about 26 inches, and he doesn't notice it.  

Having said all of that, nothing is broadcast in 1080p, but the TV has a scaler in it that upconverts the signal to 1080p.  I think the newest version of XBOX is 1080p, and maybe the PS3 but that is about it.  It is coming soon though.  
Logged

Looks like you've been missing a lot of work lately.
I wouldn't say I've been *missing* it, Bob.
otismalibu
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 7051
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,877



« Reply #6 on: Nov 02, 2007 at 09:49 »

Quote
I really disagree with this. I think they all have a really good wide viewing angle. My wife and daughter (don't ask me why) sit on a love seat that is at about a 45 degree angle to the TV and there is no loss of brightness or clarity. I do have a 1080p DLP.


I guess I shouldn't have said 'pretty much straight on'. We view from an angle too and nothing is lost. But when you start getting to a fairly extreme angle, the picture looks darker. If I'm walking down the stairs and the kids are watching TV it looks darker until I get down to the same level. Not really an issue...just mentioned it. If you stuck a DLP on a high shelf at a sports bar, the pic wouldn't look as good looking up at the screen.

You can check out this site to see what you can get OTA.

http://www.antennaweb.org/aw/welcome.aspx

Worth a try seeing you may be able to watch some HD for free with what you already have, depending on where you're located.
« Last Edit: Nov 02, 2007 at 09:52 by otismalibu » Logged
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12188
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,189



« Reply #7 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 07:53 »

Bumping this.  We did a little debt consolidation, due to upcming 10th year anniversary and new car purchase for me, and I factored in enough for a new computer and new TVs for LR and BR.  

Just wanted to see if anyone had anything to add since the previous.  Currently do not have high def but might as well do it now.  Have a 27" in the bedroom, and probably will stay that size or slightly larger.  In the living room, we have a 32" set that will go bigger, although the only real spot for a set limits size.  Thinking maybe a 46"?

So, looking to:

Replace 32" set in LR with ~46-47" HD LCD 1080p.
Replace 27" set in BR with ~27-30" LCD 1080p, probably HD.
Upgrade to HD DVD.
Upgrade DVR to HD from DirecTV.

Will need wall mount for LR TV only.

Haven't even started to research, except for drooling at the big screens on the way in at Costco before settling for the 80 packs of toilet paper and the biggie boxes of Kashi.
Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
vinman3
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 1762
Offline Offline

Posts: 9,783


Master of the Obvious


« Reply #8 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 08:12 »

I highly recommend the Sony Bravia. Our 52-inch LCD with 120 Hz Refresh rate is just a beast, and has a beautiful picture. Hockey looks GREAT in HD.

In my months of research for a 52 inch TV I came up with my final two which were

Samsung LNT5271F 52-inch 1080p 120Hz LCD HDTV
and
Sony Bravia XBR KDL-52XBR4 52-Inch 1080p LCD HDTV

I ended up with the Sony, because it is in a room with a lot of light and that Samsung had a glass screen a la a plasma TV.

If you have the money to blow, Samsungs and Sonys are both rated very high, both of whom have newer versions of what I listed which are available now...Isn't that always the case :bang:

For HD DVD, go Blu-Ray. And you might as well buy the Playstation 3. It costs the same as most Blu-Ray players, and you get a high quality gaming system too.
« Last Edit: Jun 06, 2008 at 08:13 by vinman3 » Logged

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife; the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sun up. Sleep tight, mates, in your quilted Chambray nightshirts.
otismalibu
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 7051
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,877



« Reply #9 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 08:23 »

I don't think it would be an issue for you, because it doesn't look like you're going to opt  for some crazy huge living room TV, but keep in mind viewing distance. I know a guy that was looking for a 72" for his apartment. I asked him if he planned on watching it thru the window from his parking area.

If you're LR is set up where you are pretty close to the TV, bigger is not always better. Not every channel is available in HD and the SD channels often look shittier...especially the closer you get.

And see if you can't view some sports action on the set before you buy. I watched some football on a buddy's set and the action was constantly going in and out of sharp focus, ever so slightly. I think some sets have a ghosting issue too...I think that's what it's called. BV would know better than I.

When you're watching Steelers football, you want it sharp at all time...not just during the  huddles.

We too need to replace the old tube TV in the bedroom.  
Logged
otismalibu
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 7051
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,877



« Reply #10 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 08:39 »

Quote
Hockey looks GREAT in HD.

So true. World of difference between HD & SD, for pucks.

The bastards here would put the Cards on NBC, even if there was an NHL playoff game on in that time slot. Then they'd move the hockey game to some bullshit non-HD channel. Fuck boring ass baseball. Keep it on the radio.
Logged
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12188
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,189



« Reply #11 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 08:55 »

Good point on viewing distance.  Here's the scoop.  We bought a 1940 Cape Cod style house, so typical room size is smaller than what some of you guys may have.  Due to the room config, there's basically 2 places for a TV to go: over the fireplace, or in a corner between 2 windows.  Personally, I think the central location of the fireplace would squash up the TV viewing too much.  We have the current set between the windows, with 52" of space from window frame to window frame.  A 46-47" set would be about the max, without looking like it's just jammed the fuck in between the windows.

From the likely screen surface, it's abut 12-15' to our seating area.  (The TV in the armoire is out a bit more, so it's 10-13', but the LCD would be back farther.)  When we have people over, say, for Steelers games, we do have additional a la carte seating.  Grab a chair and huddle round.  Most of those seats are in the 4-6' range.  My sense is that the 4' range might blur a bit, but back around 6' you'd probably be OK.  Certainly no more than the 46" for that close.  And at the back of the room, I think anything less than a 46", you might be OK, but I think 46" would be better.  

Trying to think which ones we saw at Costco.  Sony Bravia was one and it did look good.  Still pissed over a Sony TV prior to the current one that died about a day after the 1-year warranty was up.  I saw Samsung was also at the Costco site and rated well at Amazon.   A bit leery of Vizio and other lesser-known brands.  IIRC, the Phillips HDTVS at Costco just didn't look quite as sharp.

Bottom line is, I don't care about getting some huge assed screen to impress anyone.  I just figure that the time is good for me to upgrade, and we can certainly bump the size up from what we have now.  Hopefully enhance the ol' Steelers experience.  Plus, we've always used the TV speakers, as Mrs. F. is sensitive to louder volume.  But I figure that for movies and games, if I'm upgrading everything else, I may as well get a basic satellite speaker system.
Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
vinman3
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 1762
Offline Offline

Posts: 9,783


Master of the Obvious


« Reply #12 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 09:12 »

Get an LCD with the 120 Hertz refresh rate, that helps with the motion blur. That gave the Sony and Samsung the nod over the others with only a 65 Hertz refresh rate.

Also, your room viewing distance is definitely suited for a 52.
« Last Edit: Jun 06, 2008 at 09:13 by vinman3 » Logged

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife; the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sun up. Sleep tight, mates, in your quilted Chambray nightshirts.
kchopsteel
Member
***

Karma: 211
Offline Offline

Posts: 311


WWW
« Reply #13 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 09:16 »

I purchased a 46" Sony Bravia XBR. The great thing about it is I got it off ebay for about $1200 less than the actual retail. Prior to getting this TV I also had a 32" Sony Bravia. Maybe I'm a Sony homer but IMO they make the best product.  
Logged

I am the Padiddle champion
kchopsteel
Member
***

Karma: 211
Offline Offline

Posts: 311


WWW
« Reply #14 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 09:19 »

Quote
We too need to replace the old tube in the bedroom.
Wifey must be very happy about this prospect. Maybe she'll angle for the 12" colored model.
Logged

I am the Padiddle champion
otismalibu
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 7051
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,877



« Reply #15 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 09:43 »

Quote
Plus, we've always used the TV speakers, as Mrs. F. is sensitive to louder volume. But I figure that for movies and games, if I'm upgrading everything else, I may as well get a basic satellite speaker system.


Often the sound on these TVs is pretty shitty. No one is buying them for the sound and most people add their own sound system. Some hardly have any volume at all. I'd check that, just so the Mrs. doesn't have to fire up the home theatre just to have enough volume to hear it.

The higher refresh rate might be a good idea with the LCD. I have the lower rate, but my set is a projection. I've got no blur, but my buddy also has a projection and his had the blur.

When you get it narrowed down, search this site and read up about pros & cons.

http://www.avsforum.com

Quote
Wifey must be very happy about this prospect. Maybe she'll angle for the 12" colored model.


Yeah, she called Ultimate Electronics and asked about the Alabama Black Snake model, but they had no clue.
Logged
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12188
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,189



« Reply #16 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 11:02 »

Thanks for the input guys, and keep it coming.  52" won't work, it's just not going to fit the space.  Hell, we did pretty well with that 32"er, so the difference between 46" and 52"?  [*Shrugs*]

IMO, Sony is off the table.  Sorry, but I do hold grudges.  We actually paid a couple hundred in repair charges before figuring it was a lost cause, so close to a grand for a year of TV viewing?  Fuck that.  I realize that shit happens, but I'd be super pissed if I got another Sony and the same damned thing happened...

As for the sound system, something just OK will be fine for me.  At my age, I can only hear sounds in the 10,000 -10,001 Hz range anyway, so you might as well jus tap out Morse code with the silverware...  Some basic system will be fine for me.

We'll pass on the Playstation, vin.  See "codgy old timer" rant above.  

It's interesting to me in the scant research I have done how much these TVs change even over the course of one year, in terms of definition, refresh, price...  Now looking at the series 5, 6 and 7 models, and thinking the 6 might be best for me.  
Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
otismalibu
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 7051
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,877



« Reply #17 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 13:57 »

Quote
As for the sound system, something just OK will be fine for me.

We just went with an entry level Yamaha system that had everything included. It was $300 and you could probably buy all the components separately on eBay now for much less.

The football sound is a little different when you crank the surround. Can pick up the QB's voice and the first time the whistle blew, I thought the ref was in my kitchen. Little too loud.

Having your windows facing the same way as your set is good as far as glare.  You may want to keep a bucket hat handy just in case your shiny melon causes some problems.
Logged
otismalibu
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 7051
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,877



« Reply #18 on: Jun 06, 2008 at 14:39 »

Finny,

You watch the games on the local CBS channel, correct? Is that KDKA?

How far away from their broadcast tower are you?

I'm about 20 miles from STL and can watch HD programming via a cheap antenna sitting on the floor behind my entertainment center. It's a nice option to have and it's FREE.
Logged
Big Virgil
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 3768
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,244



« Reply #19 on: Jun 09, 2008 at 08:02 »

Quote
Get an LCD with the 120 Hertz refresh rate, that helps with the motion blur. That gave the Sony and Samsung the nod over the others with only a 65 Hertz refresh rate.

Also, your room viewing distance is definitely suited for a 52.
A lot of the blur Vin and Otis are talking about are from the projection LCD's that were 1080i instead of 1080p.  The 1080p's and the refresh rate Vin is talking about really eliminate the blur issue on sets from a few years ago.

If you viewing distance is 12-15 feet, you definitely want to be in that 52" to 56" range.  at 12' 52" would be a good size.  at 15' 56"would be better.  If you are spending the money, don't skimp, go with something where you will be able to actually see the football during a play, the puck in hockey, or the ball while watching tennis.  A friend just finished his basement, and the distance is in that same 12-15 foot range and he has a 44".  What an aboslute waste of money, finishing the basement, then having a really undersized TV.  The NBA playoffs had just started and I was almost squinting to distinguish certain players.  Is it better than a 32"?  Yes, but why even bother.  I also have to say that I am not a proponent of having a TV so big you'll go blind from watching it.  Too big is worse, especially if your LCD is going to be a a flat panel.  Regardless, from that distance, I think you want to start at 52", IMO.  

My TV is a projection, and my kids sit on the floor about 5 feet from it, which would make me go blind, and it is all the same to them.

Let us know what you get and what you think after it is up and running.
Logged

Looks like you've been missing a lot of work lately.
I wouldn't say I've been *missing* it, Bob.
steelerfaninCO
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 1270
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,466



« Reply #20 on: Jun 14, 2008 at 11:27 »

I'm thinking about getting the new 46" Sony Bravia W LCD. Its got the 120hz refresh rate. Anybody uprgraded from the 60hz yet? Does it make that much difference?... Also thinking about a Blu-ray player, but wondering if the new Sony unit is really 200 bucks better than the Samsung and the cheaper, older Sony. I have a PS3 and an upconverter now, but the PS3 is kind of pain to work as a Blu-ray player. Anyone have thoughts on Blu-ray players?
Logged
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12188
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,189



« Reply #21 on: Jun 15, 2008 at 09:51 »

Still researching all this.  Virg, I may go with the 40-42" size after all simply because the space where we'll be putting the LCD will be situated between two windows.  We COULD go up to 46" or so, but that would basically have the thing jammed right up to the window frames.  The 40-42" may win simply based on aesthetics and the fact that, while the screen size may not be optimal for some, it will be fine for us, and as stated an improvement.

Right now I'm trying to figure out how much difference I can tell between 8 ms. and 6 ms. ad 4 ms. refresh rates; 25,000:1, 50,000:1 and 100,000:1 dynamic contrasts; etc.  At a certain point, am I paying for specs or someting I can actually see?  So the next step will be to go to some Best Buys, etc., and see the difference now that I know what the specs are about.

Does anyone have a PS3 they use for DVD/Blu-Ray viewing?  I'm thinking that if I want to foray into Blu-Ray, the PS3 is about the same damned price as most Blu-Ray players anyway.  I'm not much into games, but a free game device, why the fuck not?

My problem is that I'd like to have that, but I'd also like to get a DVD burner so I can just start burning Steeler games and favorite movies and shows to free Tivo space, and for future viewing... But then getting a DVD player/recorder PLUS the Blu-Ray is a bit redundant in my book.

Much to consider.
Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
steelerfaninCO
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 1270
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,466



« Reply #22 on: Jun 15, 2008 at 11:37 »

Quote
.

Does anyone have a PS3 they use for DVD/Blu-Ray viewing?  I'm thinking that if I want to foray into Blu-Ray, the PS3 is about the same damned price as most Blu-Ray players anyway.  I'm not much into games, but a free game device, why the fuck not?

My problem is that I'd like to have that, but I'd also like to get a DVD burner so I can just start burning Steeler games and favorite movies and shows to free Tivo space, and for future viewing... But then getting a DVD player/recorder PLUS the Blu-Ray is a bit redundant in my book.

Much to consider.
Ya, I use a PS3 for Blu-ray. It uploads faster than stand alone players, but you use the game controller as a remote. Its wireless but a bit of fuckery as well... I have a 42" LG 1080i 60hz right now, and I think I'm going to go to a 46" 1080p 120hz. Probably the Sony W Bravia.

Finny, I would consider a Sony(duly noted you don't like Sony) DVD Direct. Its a small stand alone that you can plug a camcorder, camera, or a DVR into and it makes DVD's. I have a one and it works great.

I'm still on the fence about getting a different Blu-ray player.
Logged
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12188
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,189



« Reply #23 on: Jun 15, 2008 at 17:16 »

Went to BB today and I have to say that the two models I liked best by the specs -- the Samsung series 6 40" and the Sony Bravia V-Series 40" -- both looked fucking awesome.  Marched off 15' for max distance home viewing, and honestly I think it'll be fine.  I understand the argument to go bigger, but with our space constraints, I think we're good.  I'd rather do a smaller, better than a larger last year model with slower refresh, lower contrast, etc., for the same price.

Mrs. F. is balking.  Quote: "I don't want to spend that much on a TV..."  Although Amazon is cheaper.  

One gambit might be to wait on the Blu-Ray until it comes down, and possibly replace the bedroom set later, too.  

 
Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
vinman3
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 1762
Offline Offline

Posts: 9,783


Master of the Obvious


« Reply #24 on: Jun 16, 2008 at 06:52 »

You don't have to use the controller as the remote for the PS3 to view Blu Ray discs. They now have a $20 DVD remote made for the PS3. It uses Bluetooth, and does work well.
« Last Edit: Jun 16, 2008 at 06:53 by vinman3 » Logged

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife; the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sun up. Sleep tight, mates, in your quilted Chambray nightshirts.
Big Virgil
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 3768
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,244



« Reply #25 on: Jun 16, 2008 at 08:11 »

Quote
Went to BB today and I have to say that the two models I liked best by the specs -- the Samsung series 6 40" and the Sony Bravia V-Series 40" -- both looked fucking awesome.  Marched off 15' for max distance home viewing, and honestly I think it'll be fine.  I understand the argument to go bigger, but with our space constraints, I think we're good.  I'd rather do a smaller, better than a larger last year model with slower refresh, lower contrast, etc., for the same price.

Mrs. F. is balking.  Quote: "I don't want to spend that much on a TV..."  Although Amazon is cheaper.  

One gambit might be to wait on the Blu-Ray until it comes down, and possibly replace the bedroom set later, too.
When the general public starts upgrading to these types of TV's I think Mrs. F's reaction is pretty standard.  The days of walking into a store, looking at a couple of TV's and walking out of there $500 lighter in the wallet are over.

Tell her she isn't paying that much just for a TV.  Tell her she is upgradiong from a TV to a home theatre experience.  Mrs. BV doesn't realize when some things are HD or SD, which tells you her level of interest, but she digs watching movies on the upconverting DVD player.  Prime time TV, sportig events, and old movies in HD are just awesome.  I watched an old movie over the weekend, American Flyer (Kevin Costner and his brothere enter a bike race) and it was like watching a completely different movie, compared to the grainy SD 1983 version.

 
Logged

Looks like you've been missing a lot of work lately.
I wouldn't say I've been *missing* it, Bob.
aj_law
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5532
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,970


« Reply #26 on: Jun 18, 2008 at 12:44 »

Quote
Currently do not have high def but might as well do it now.  

So, looking to:

Replace 32" set in LR with ~46-47" HD LCD 1080p.
Replace 27" set in BR with ~27-30" LCD 1080p, probably HD.
Upgrade to HD DVD.
Upgrade DVR to HD from DirecTV.
 
Welcome to the club.  

Life will never be the same.
Logged

We suck because our drafts have been THE SUCK.
Pages: 1 2 3 [All]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal
| Sitemap
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!