Maximum Grilled Steelers Forum
Nov 23, 2014 at 02:47 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
  Home   Forum   Help Calendar Media Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 ... 5 [All]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 2008 PRESEASON - at Buffalo (in Toronto)  (Read 5830 times)
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12195
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,377



« on: Aug 14, 2008 at 10:10 »

Any thoughts on who needs to step up?

QB.  Obviously want to see Lefty run the offense competently, and have Dixon show constant improvement.  Can Ben show his skills on the hot read and checkdown again?  Potts is a non-factor.

OL.  Last game, we had the highest % of runs of any team.  This week, I want to see if we can effectively pass pro, especially Kemo.  I want Hartwig to come out and dominate.  I'd like someone to push Simmons... Stapleton?

WR.  One of the bubble WRs (Dallas Clark, Willie Reid) needs to clarify the picture.  It's starting to look like we will carry 6, with Drummond primarily a KR, and Jeremy Bloom looks done.  Micah Rucker might be a PS guy.

TE.  The number three spot is up for grabs, and Cody Boyd IMO is the best bet here.  But neither he nor Dekker nor Sherrod have stoood out.

RB.  No worries, mon.  FWP, RM, MW, GR, and CD look pretty well set here.  I would add that Justin Vincent has shown enough to make it interesting, though, and even with this surfeit I'd stash him on the PS.  

DL.  Presumably, Snack is back, so see if we stop the run any better.  Depth is the issue, and this IMO is the hottest battle right now.  Eason and Kirschke are the waning vets, and Ryan McBean the second year guy who needs to turn it on NOW.  Would love to see Martavius Prince or Jordan Reffett really push for a backup spot, as well.  Paxson looks undersized for a NT, and may be on the outs.

LB.  Still watching Timmons and Woodley with great expectations.  Where the hell is Bruce Davis?  Keyaron Fox showed good speed and awareness, and with STs play he looks to have won a job inside, with Timmons, Foote, and Farrior.  That might make things tougher for Mike Humpal, who IMO looked pretty good as well, and who may be more natural inside than out.  If Humpal can show versatility inside and out and some STs play, he could bump Dre Frazier or Arnold Harrison.  Would the Steelers carry 9 LBs?

DBs.  Wherefore art thou, Troy?  I hope and pray Anthony "Thuggery" Smith gets lots of snaps at SS, where IMO he could effectively fill in and lay the wood.  Ty Carter is too old and slow, and Troy gets dinged way too much.  Smith's aggressive nature fits the spot.  Bryant McFadden's starter window looks to be closing, and William Gay needs to show he can do it again this year to fend off guys like Grant Mason and Anthony Madison, which I think he will.  A couple of exciting UDFA CBs are Travis Williams out of East Carolina, and the guy Tomlin's buzzed about, Roy Lewis out of Washington.  Lewis could make the mess at S clearer if he can show acumen at both DB positions.  This guy could be nothing more than PS material, but it seems like he's opening eyes.  Maybe he makes it.
Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
Preacherman0
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5808
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,847



WWW
« Reply #1 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 12:14 »

Quote
LB. Still watching Timmons and Woodley with great expectations. Where the hell is Bruce Davis? Keyaron Fox showed good speed and awareness, and with STs play he looks to have won a job inside, with Timmons, Foote, and Farrior. That might make things tougher for Mike Humpal, who IMO looked pretty good as well, and who may be more natural inside than out. If Humpal can show versatility inside and out and some STs play, he could bump Dre Frazier or Arnold Harrison. Would the Steelers carry 9 LBs?

Top to bottom, I thought this group was the only impressive thing about our defense vs. Philly.

Any idea if the game is going to be televised nationally by anyone?  NFL Network?
Logged

We have traded Christ for the religion of Christianity.
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12195
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,377



« Reply #2 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 12:26 »

Quote
Quote
LB. Still watching Timmons and Woodley with great expectations. Where the hell is Bruce Davis? Keyaron Fox showed good speed and awareness, and with STs play he looks to have won a job inside, with Timmons, Foote, and Farrior. That might make things tougher for Mike Humpal, who IMO looked pretty good as well, and who may be more natural inside than out. If Humpal can show versatility inside and out and some STs play, he could bump Dre Frazier or Arnold Harrison. Would the Steelers carry 9 LBs?

Top to bottom, I thought this group was the only impressive thing about our defense vs. Philly.

Any idea if the game is going to be televised nationally by anyone?  NFL Network?

It's on the 212 at 11:00 IIRC.

Plus for those of you in Amish country, it's on CBS 21.
« Last Edit: Aug 14, 2008 at 12:48 by Finnegans Wake » Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
otismalibu
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 7055
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,917



« Reply #3 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 12:42 »

Quote
Any idea if the game is going to be televised nationally by anyone? NFL Network?

I think it's on FSN Pittsburgh, for peeps outside the local viewing area. Channel 628 for DT, I think.
Logged
DCSteelers
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 553
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,460


WWW
« Reply #4 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 14:17 »

I want to see Hartwig- I'd also like to see Sweed w/ the first team.

It's on @ 12:00 on the NFL network here.  I'm going to stay away from the news and puter till I see the first half.
Logged
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #5 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 15:10 »

I'm interested in how Leftwich does, the DL and OL.  

LBs, RBs, and WRs seem to be doing well, though certainly there are minor battles.  
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
vcuram
Brownstains can suck my Member
****

Karma: 430
Offline Offline

Posts: 717


WWW
« Reply #6 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 15:24 »

Obviously we're all interested in how the OL plays.  I'm, however, very concerned with the DL.  Lots of question marks, no depth, and they played pretty poorly without A. Smith last year.

I have mixed feelings about the Lefty vs. Batch thing.  If Ben goes down, we're most likely screwed.  Batch probably makes us less screwed, but Lefty has the potential make some plays down the field and keep the offense exciting.  I'm not sure about Dixon, so it wouldn't be a bad move to keep Lefty and Batch, then trying to sneak Dixon on the PS.

Tonight I'm really looking at the DL, Lefty, the improved return game (especially Moore, I think he's going to be good for us), and the punting situation.  I thought the LBs looked solid last game, but I hope the secondary can show a little more.

Oh yeah, fuck Canada.
Logged

I've thrown a kettle over a pub before.  What the fuck have you ever done?
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #7 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 16:09 »

I'm on the fence re: Dixon.

I don't see him as a "Slash" player; he's QB-only in my book.

But I think he can be a good QB.  Maybe a good back up, maybe a good starter as the way Ben plays, he's bound to miss a few more games during his career, or maybe a good trade down the line.

At the same time, quality back-up QBs are available all of the time.  Having both Lefty and Pep in for work outs this late in the camp sessions lends itself to the idea that a team 1) does not need to draft a backup and 2) there isn't much point in grooming a late round QB for a backup role.  

Then again, the Steelers have had a difficult time getting decent returns from their Day Two picks in the past few years (though they seem to find many gems in UDFA).

Dixon won't sneak to the PS.  Too much upside and is a worthy #3 QB.  Not ready for the #2 QB spot yet.

If I were running the show, I would IR Batch and go with Lefty and Dixon.  
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
otismalibu
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 7055
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,917



« Reply #8 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 17:08 »

Quote
Oh yeah, fuck Canada.

Better strippers, better beer, stronger dollar.

Not exactly an Olympic powerhouse, but the free health care is nice, if you don't mind the wait.

And, last I checked, the CN Tower....

Never mind.
Logged
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #9 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 18:42 »

Can watch the game on-line at P2P....http://xssports.rack111.com/
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #10 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 18:47 »

Steelers pass pro didn't look great on that drive that ended with Whitner's INT
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #11 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 18:54 »

Robert Royal catches a TD in-between Ty Carter and the best coverage LB James Farrior

 
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #12 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:01 »

Spaeth with a nice catch...hope they use him more (Heat too) this year....didn't I say that last year?
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #13 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:03 »

I think that's the first time I've ever seen Ben throw it away.........
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #14 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:08 »

JAMES HARRISON! WITH THE SACK!
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #15 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:13 »

Our DBs are taking some pretty poor angles...poor tackling overall.
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #16 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:14 »

Ryan Clark misses a tackle
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #17 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:18 »

Just a preseason game but the Steelers' D is getting worked.  They look lethargic and uninterested out there.
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #18 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:18 »

Hello?
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
Brinker
Lennar Homes Consultant
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 2858
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,785


Mr Jack


WWW
« Reply #19 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:22 »

Direct TV has it blacked out outside of Pittsburgh and Buffalo.


Bunch of Bullshit

keep me updated on score...etc


Brinker
Logged

"He'll just smile and be cordial out there. Then he'll kill you."
--Aaron Smith, Defensive Lineman, on Troy Polamulu
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #20 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:28 »

Brinker....use the link I posted earlier in the thread to watch the game on-line.

The P2P website has a great feed.

TD to HOLMES!!! Great pass and catch!

The OL doesn't look great when they are running but looks better than I expected in pass pro.

Hartwig hasn't looked great.  Sort of Mahan-ish IMO.  

A few penalties so far tonight on the 1st team OL.  

 
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #21 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:32 »

Timmons in
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
Brinker
Lennar Homes Consultant
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 2858
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,785


Mr Jack


WWW
« Reply #22 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:42 »

Wow amazed at the quality............th anks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Brinker
Logged

"He'll just smile and be cordial out there. Then he'll kill you."
--Aaron Smith, Defensive Lineman, on Troy Polamulu
Brinker
Lennar Homes Consultant
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 2858
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,785


Mr Jack


WWW
« Reply #23 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 19:47 »

Timmons
Logged

"He'll just smile and be cordial out there. Then he'll kill you."
--Aaron Smith, Defensive Lineman, on Troy Polamulu
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #24 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 20:34 »

Mend with a late TD.















Rabbit rabbit
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #25 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 20:41 »

I've never heard such admiration for the Bills prior to listening to this Bills' feed.  

It's absolutely awe-inspiring.......
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
SCacalaki
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 4449
Offline Offline

Posts: 14,500


WWW
« Reply #26 on: Aug 14, 2008 at 21:07 »

Great run by Dixon on 4th down for a TD.

Not sure who #84 is this year (Jerame Tuman's Ghost???) but he had a great block.  

Sweed lucked into not fucking up the block and Dixon got in for the TD.

Dixon has looked really good tonight.  No indecision on his part.
Logged

Words to live by:  "Dick LeBeau is Dick LeBeau," Tomlin said. "Everybody knows Dick."
DCSteelers
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 553
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,460


WWW
« Reply #27 on: Aug 15, 2008 at 00:12 »

Very poor showing by the first team D- they took the night off.  I saw snack just lethargically putting up some resitance before Hoke came in.

Poor showing by the first team O-Line.
Logged
aj_law
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5538
Offline Offline

Posts: 15,175


« Reply #28 on: Aug 15, 2008 at 08:33 »

I TIVOed this game and was plannin' on watching it sometime late tonight, but judging by most of the responses I've read, my time would be better served doing something useful like...perusing porn sites.

Yes?
Logged

We suck because our drafts have been THE SUCK.
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12195
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,377



« Reply #29 on: Aug 15, 2008 at 08:37 »

Quote
I TIVOed this game and was plannin' on watching it sometime late tonight, but judging by most of the responses I've read, my time would be better served doing something useful like...perusing porn sites.

Yes?
I Tivoed as well, and watched about the first half before starting to snooze out around midnight.  I'm anxious to see how Dixon does, so I'll probably re-watch what I saw plus the rest.

It's nothing to shart yer shorts over, that's for sure, but it won't convince you we're world-beaters.  Some good drives killed by stupid stuff.  LeBeau doing the vanilla thing, mostly.  

Hell, it's Steeler football.
Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
Merman1983
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5206
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,559


Master of the figure-four leglock


« Reply #30 on: Aug 15, 2008 at 10:44 »

Quote
I TIVOed this game and was plannin' on watching it sometime late tonight, but judging by most of the responses I've read, my time would be better served doing something useful like...perusing porn sites.

Yes?
The first team offensive line looked bad. Flashes of last year with Ben making some "pressure/scrambling throws" that we've become accustomed to.

Ward and Holmes being Ward and Holmes. Really hope these guys stay healthy together for most of the year. Parker looks ok, he's going to be fine i think.

First team defense very sloppy. Vanilla defense but that's to be expected in the preason. Pushed around in the run game & missed a buttload of tackles, but once again it's preseason and they haven't had the chance to hit in game much. I'll feel alot better when Troy's back, Snack's in game shape, and Woodley and Harrison get unleashed. Not real worried here.

Leftwich looks rusty, again expected since he only practiced 2 days. He definitely has to take some mutard off some of his throws, he'd throw a 20 post on a rope, but then fire a 10 yard curl/slant in there just as hard. Also he is a statue back there. More reps will mean the world to him.

Mendenhall definiely has his moments. 11 carries for 30ish and the TD, and I think he converted a third and 1. Looking more comfortable, getting used to the fact that this isn't the big ten.

While his final line doesn't impress, Dixon looked worlds ahead of where he was last week. Besides looking more comfortable dropping back in the pocket, he looked more comfortable making throws downfield (even of the 12-15 yard variety). This might not make sense but he looked alot more like a quarterback this week.

Timmons. Wow. He destroyed 3 different Bills quarterbacks and is ALWAYS around the ball. He tackles through people. He looks like a bigger, stronger, rookie year Kendrell. I know alot of his damage was against the second team, but I don't think that there is any way that Foote keeps this guy off the field.

Sloppy game overall I guess, but I'd at least watch the second half. Worth it to see Dixon and Timmons IMO.

 
 
Logged
aj_law
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5538
Offline Offline

Posts: 15,175


« Reply #31 on: Aug 15, 2008 at 12:11 »

Hey, thanks for the write up and welcome.  I was gonna watch, regardless.  My comment was really meant as tongue in (ass) cheek.

Um, just curious, but when the hell did we get 6,400+ members?  Was there some kind of giveaway that I missed?  If that number is right, we've got a helluva lot of lurkers out there...
Logged

We suck because our drafts have been THE SUCK.
jonzr
Asst. VP, Jonzring
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 11364
Offline Offline

Posts: 11,823


Have a cup o' joe.


WWW
« Reply #32 on: Aug 15, 2008 at 13:26 »

Quote
Um, just curious, but when the hell did we get 6,400+ members?  Was there some kind of giveaway that I missed?  If that number is right, we've got a helluva lot of lurkers out there...
I'm just seeing 857 members.  If it suddenly went to 6,400+ we'd have to assume a horde of trolls or some such, the filthy bastards.

 
Logged

"I like David Bowie, he was always my favorite member of Tin Machine."
- Rodney Anonymous

It's a Steeler Nation
aj_law
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5538
Offline Offline

Posts: 15,175


« Reply #33 on: Aug 15, 2008 at 13:52 »

Quote
I'm just seeing 857 members.  If it suddenly went to 6,400+ we'd have to assume a horde of trolls or some such, the filthy bastards.
Merman's listed as #6445.
Logged

We suck because our drafts have been THE SUCK.
aj_law
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5538
Offline Offline

Posts: 15,175


« Reply #34 on: Aug 18, 2008 at 11:47 »

Got around to watching the game on Friday.  Here's what I remember thinking as the game played out:
  • Ben looks pretty sharp for this early in the preseason.
  • Willie doesn't look like he's lost a step.  If the line can even marginally improve over last season, he should be near the league leaders in yardage.  TD numbers might take a hit though with RM, GR and MW absorbing some of the rushing load.  Still like how GR looks between the lines more than RM.  Worst case scenario is that WP has two very good RBs watching his back.
  • Ward and Holmes look solid and razor sharp...after them...eh.  I've never hidden my dislike for Reid.  I thought he should've gotten the axe last year.  Sweed looks a little...I'm not sure how best to put this...clumsy, maybe?  Yeah, I know, he's a rookie and "rookie WRs usually take 2 to 3 years to really develop...blah, blah, blah."  I get that much.  It's just that I expected him to look a little sharper and not as overwhelmed as he looks...to me, anyways.  I think he'll be pretty good, but maybe it's just that the curve is a little longer that I had expected for him.  After all, he was "first round talent" that slipped well into R2.  Baker looks very good to me.
  • O-line looks eerily similar to '07.  There's just different numbers on the jerseys.  Smith looked OK, but not quite up to speed yet.  Same story with Kemo...get him moving backward and you never know.  Hartwig is a big disappointment as he's essentially a stronger Mahan clone.  I'll say this about Starks...he must've really pissed somebody off because Colon has not impressed me at all in the first two preseason games; holding a lot; getting beat by a speed rush, etc.  If you're going to get beat on the edges, at least put your 7 million dollar tackle out there and let him have at it.  Don't have much to say about Simmons as he didn't really catch my eye.  Maybe I just missed it or maybe he was quietly doing his job.  *shrugs*
  • Defensively, they look pretty listless.  If there's a group that's going through the motions, this is it.  IMO, I think a lot of that has to do with the battles (or lack thereof) for starting spots.  Really, with the exception of Harrison (obv) and possibly Woodley, almost all of the guys have a starting spot locked up.  The one area that isn't (Foote's spot) is where we're seeing some real hustle by Timmons because...*dramatic gasp*...he's trying to win that spot.  While Timmons has provided some energy and shown flashes of that athletic ability, I'm just not sure that he has what it takes to play inside in a 3-4.  IMO, he's not very stout and gets easily bogged down on running plays.  Really, with his speed, he seems like the ideal Will LB in a 4-3.
  • The secondary looks much the same, but I think many are overlooking the effect that having Clark back will have on this group.  What's crazy is that I'm now starting to worry more about Polamalu ever being 100% (physically and mentally) than I am about Clark.  Townsend is still giving the kids fits that are trying to take his job, but again, at the very least, McFadden/Gay provide solid depth and nickel coverage.
« Last Edit: Aug 18, 2008 at 11:48 by aj_law » Logged

We suck because our drafts have been THE SUCK.
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12195
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,377



« Reply #35 on: Aug 18, 2008 at 13:24 »

Quote
Ben looks pretty sharp for this early in the preseason.

I think we all knew Ben had the potential to be Ben of 2007, but it was a sigh of relief after the 2006 season.  The question then became: can Ben be not just one of the best in the NFL, but an elite QB?  Guys like Brees and Delhomme and whoever might rise into the top-5 statistically any given year, but come on, they're not elite.  Right now, I think Ben is on the verge of being there.  

A lot of the talking heads still seem to struggle with that, but this year might change things.  In addition to great rappor with Holmes, Ward, and Miller, Ben seems to be making some necessary steps in checking down and throwing the ball away.  I've said it before: Favre should be a cautionary tale for Ben.  Great natural talent, gutsy, risk-taker, great improviser, makes plays on the move.  But IMO Favre made too many late career mistakes, and it just seems he didn't take the mental aspect to the next level post-Holmgren.  I doubt Ben breaks Favre's numbers, but he could turn out to be a better QB.

Quote
Willie doesn't look like he's lost a step. If the line can even marginally improve over last season, he should be near the league leaders in yardage. TD numbers might take a hit though with RM, GR and MW absorbing some of the rushing load. Still like how GR looks between the lines more than RM. Worst case scenario is that WP has two very good RBs watching his back.

I think we need to let Mendenhall continue to learn.  He could still very well turn out to be a solid goal-line threat.  IMO, it's doubtful GR suits on Sundays, much as I like him.  Just a numbers thang.  

As to Parker's health, he looked just fine up close.  Great speed, incredible conditioning, back to form.


Quote
Ward and Holmes look solid and razor sharp...after them...eh. I've never hidden my dislike for Reid. I thought he should've gotten the axe last year. Sweed looks a little...I'm not sure how best to put this...clumsy, maybe? Yeah, I know, he's a rookie and "rookie WRs usually take 2 to 3 years to really develop...blah, blah, blah." I get that much. It's just that I expected him to look a little sharper and not as overwhelmed as he looks...to me, anyways. I think he'll be pretty good, but maybe it's just that the curve is a little longer that I had expected for him. After all, he was "first round talent" that slipped well into R2. Baker looks very good to me.

Ward's the Energizer Bunny.  I know he's 32 and was dinged up last year, but I could see him player until he's 35, 36.  Holmes is blowing shit up.  If he stays healthy, he's one of the five best WRs this year.

Not many teams have as good a 1-2 punch, and few have great third and fourth receivers.  Washington is fine in his capacity, so we're really talking about Sweed as a #4 now, #3 next year.  I know what you're saying about not being smooth, but that will come as he learns.  One play he's dropping an easy pass or tripping over himself, the next he looks smooth as buttah.

Anything beyond that is icing, IMO.  I think Drummond will stick as a KR, and I think they may carry a #6 WR (really, a #5, Drummond isn't much as a receiver).  And I think that will be Baker.   You're right, Reid is too up and down.  I really wanted this kid to make it, but he's still not there.  Baker, OTOH, seems to show up every play.  I think he worked his tail off in the off-season.  Not sure what the issue with Reid is, talent or confidence, but it doesn't look to be happening.

Micah Rucker (6'6"!) is also a guy to keep an eye on.  Not making the 53 IMO, but worth stashing on the PS.  Actually looked pretty consistent, IMO.  If Nate leaves, we look to have a pipeline of real developmental WR depth, rather than the pipe dreams of such talent of years past.  

Quote
O-line looks eerily similar to '07. There's just different numbers on the jerseys. Smith looked OK, but not quite up to speed yet. Same story with Kemo...get him moving backward and you never know. Hartwig is a big disappointment as he's essentially a stronger Mahan clone. I'll say this about Starks...he must've really pissed somebody off because Colon has not impressed me at all in the first two preseason games; holding a lot; getting beat by a speed rush, etc. If you're going to get beat on the edges, at least put your 7 million dollar tackle out there and let him have at it. Don't have much to say about Simmons as he didn't really catch my eye. Maybe I just missed it or maybe he was quietly doing his job. *shrugs*

I think it will be very similar, but maybe incrementally better.  Marvel being healthy is incrementally better than Marvel dinged, and I say that because Marvel was still giving it up against Buffalo.  Big Chris Kemoeatu will be incrementally better than Faneca, which I know is heretical, but I think he's a guy who will really add a lot this year, whereas Faneca's star is dimming slightly.  Hartwig is incrementally better than Mahan, because it's hard to be worse, and I think he'll be just a bit better.  Simmons is Simmons.  Colon is Colon.  The second year cohesion makes us incrementally better just because last year the guys were struggling with the change from Grimm.  I think we may see ~40 sacks, which, ya know, is incrementally better...

Quote
Defensively, they look pretty listless. If there's a group that's going through the motions, this is it. IMO, I think a lot of that has to do with the battles (or lack thereof) for starting spots. Really, with the exception of Harrison (obv) and possibly Woodley, almost all of the guys have a starting spot locked up. The one area that isn't (Foote's spot) is where we're seeing some real hustle by Timmons because...*dramatic gasp*...he's trying to win that spot. While Timmons has provided some energy and shown flashes of that athletic ability, I'm just not sure that he has what it takes to play inside in a 3-4. IMO, he's not very stout and gets easily bogged down on running plays. Really, with his speed, he seems like the ideal Will LB in a 4-3.

Same guys looked like loafers last preseason and came out stout.  I'm more worried about depth and the season stretch.   Where's Woodley been in the preseason?  All-world in Latrobe, he's invisible on film.  I really think Timmons could be another Kendrell Bell, hopefully sans injuries.  Don't think he's not stout: he's 6'1" 234#; Farrior is 6'2" 243# and Foote is 6'1" 239#.  I think it's more that he has to get his reps and wrap guys up, learn the angles and the responsibilities.  Foote's a solid player, but he looked awful, just awful his first couple of years here.  Learned the position.  Learned the defense.  I think we need Timmons's speed, nothing against Foote.  Rotate the two for now, but sooner or later...
Quote

The secondary looks much the same, but I think many are overlooking the effect that having Clark back will have on this group. What's crazy is that I'm now starting to worry more about Polamalu ever being 100% (physically and mentally) than I am about Clark. Townsend is still giving the kids fits that are trying to take his job, but again, at the very least, McFadden/Gay provide solid depth and nickel coverage.

I agree completely.  Well, 43's mental health doesn't worry me, but I see a great career possibly checkered by injury.  And IMO this is because LeBeau uses him poorly, too much up near the line, blitzing waaaaay too often.  He gets picked up all the time and abused by big linemen.  I don't see Troy as a SS at all.  Put him in the backfield and let him roam.  Bring Thug Smith up to the SS spot to compete there with Clark.
 
Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
aj_law
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5538
Offline Offline

Posts: 15,175


« Reply #36 on: Aug 18, 2008 at 16:00 »

Quote
Ward's the Energizer Bunny. I know he's 32 and was dinged up last year, but I could see him player until he's 35, 36. Holmes is blowing shit up. If he stays healthy, he's one of the five best WRs this year.


3 or 4 more years for Hines?  I'd like to see it, but I wouldn't bank on it.  Cap hit gets really big for him next year (don't know why 11 million is dancing around in my skull).  If that number is right, I don't see Pittsburgh paying him that much and I also don't see him taking a Bettis~like approach either.  That leaves them at an impasse.  It wouldn't surprise me at all if he followed the Red Route and tried to ink that one last big paycheck someplace else.

I hope I'm wrong, but if Hines plays out his career in Pittsburgh, it's going to have to be for a reduced rate.  We'll see if he balks at it.

Quote
Not many teams have as good a 1-2 punch, and few have great third and fourth receivers. Washington is fine in his capacity, so we're really talking about Sweed as a #4 now, #3 next year. I know what you're saying about not being smooth, but that will come as he learns. One play he's dropping an easy pass or tripping over himself, the next he looks smooth as buttah.


I'd so rather see Baker over Washington.  If they're willing to tag Starks and sit him, they should be willing to do the same with Baker over Washington.  I just think he's so much better.

Quote
I think it will be very similar, but maybe incrementally better. Marvel being healthy is incrementally better than Marvel dinged, and I say that because Marvel was still giving it up against Buffalo. Big Chris Kemoeatu will be incrementally better than Faneca, which I know is heretical, but I think he's a guy who will really add a lot this year, whereas Faneca's star is dimming slightly. Hartwig is incrementally better than Mahan, because it's hard to be worse, and I think he'll be just a bit better. Simmons is Simmons. Colon is Colon. The second year cohesion makes us incrementally better just because last year the guys were struggling with the change from Grimm. I think we may see ~40 sacks, which, ya know, is incrementally better...


Man, the resident bastard gettin' all glass half-full on us...Who are you??

Quote
I really think Timmons could be another Kendrell Bell, hopefully sans injuries. Don't think he's not stout: he's 6'1" 234#; Farrior is 6'2" 243# and Foote is 6'1" 239#. I think it's more that he has to get his reps and wrap guys up, learn the angles and the responsibilities.


IMO, Timmons will never be that kind of player.  Bell had speed, but he could manhandle/bullrush a lineman that outweighed him by 50#+.  Timmons relies much more on finesse/speed than strength.  Although he's similar in size and weight to Farrior/Foote, I don't see him ever being a player that can lower his shoulder, take on a lead block, shed it and make a tackle.  If a team puts a body on him, he's done.  Again, just this guy's $0.02 worth.

Quote
I agree completely. Well, 43's mental health doesn't worry me, but I see a great career possibly checkered by injury. And IMO this is because LeBeau uses him poorly, too much up near the line, blitzing waaaaay too often. He gets picked up all the time and abused by big linemen. I don't see Troy as a SS at all. Put him in the backfield and let him roam. Bring Thug Smith up to the SS spot to compete there with Clark.


I dunno.  Is it Lebeau using him poorly or are his offseason off-the-beaten-path workouts starting to catch up to him?  27 ain't old, but at what point will he have to give in and scrap the alternative workouts and opt for the more traditional NFL approach?

I'm not sayin' that it's the definitive answer, but...I dunno.  It doesn't seem like what he's been doing is ridiculously effective either.
« Last Edit: Aug 18, 2008 at 16:01 by aj_law » Logged

We suck because our drafts have been THE SUCK.
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12195
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,377



« Reply #37 on: Aug 18, 2008 at 19:01 »

You're right about Ward's cap poison pill: they'll re-assess where he is.  If he can still bring it (maybe he's our #3 behind San Antonio and Lima Tweed then), they re-work the last couple years and inject more gauranteed.  I dunno.  But I think he can physically be a guy who will be in the league for a few more.

Baker's having a real nice pre-season, but he's nowhere near as game-day ready as Nate is.  But I am heartened by his progress.

If 40 sacks is "glass half full," well, guess I am.  Just sayin', we may see minor improvements, but nothing to stop wearing the Depends over.

Timmons v. Bell: I agree, Bell was better at layin' the wood; Timmons is better sideline-to-sideline.  I think you get a lineman on most LBs and it's over: real question is, how good is he at the point of attack, at stopping his man.  Less a rhino (charge right at the target) and more cheetah (chase it down).  But my point is speed and explosiveness.  I think Timmons is the kinda guy who knifes up the middle so fast and gets a few sacks that just leave you shaking your head.  Just isn't gonna pop the pads like Bell.

I stand by my critique of LeBeau.  I mean, watch some film from the last couple of years and see how many times 43 runs into blockers who outweigh him by 75# and snuff him out every time.  It's too damned predictable.  I'd rather have him roam like a shark in the middle and deep.  Or if you keep him up, blitz less often.  Seriously do not think it's the wacky regimen.
Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
Big Virgil
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 3768
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,253



« Reply #38 on: Aug 19, 2008 at 07:53 »

Quote
Direct TV has it blacked out outside of Pittsburgh and Buffalo.


Bunch of Bullshit

keep me updated on score...etc


Brinker
The game wasn't "blacked out" it just wasn't nationally televised.  NFL Network will show one game (I think there were 3 games that had the same kickoff time) and show the other games later on NFLN.  I recorded the game at about 1:00 a.m. and watched it Sat morning.
Logged

Looks like you've been missing a lot of work lately.
I wouldn't say I've been *missing* it, Bob.
otismalibu
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 7055
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,917



« Reply #39 on: Aug 19, 2008 at 08:06 »

Quote
The game wasn't "blacked out" it just wasn't nationally televised.

The game was scheduled to be shown live on FSN Pitt and it was blacked out. I assumed they would only black it out in the Pittsburgh area, where it would also be shown on KDKA. A buddy of mine ordered the sports package for DTV just before kickoff, only to find out the game was blacked out on FSN Pitt. I was watching the FSN pre-game show at the bar and then blacked out when the clock struck 6:30pm.
 
Logged
LambertsFrontTeeth
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 1617
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,462



« Reply #40 on: Aug 19, 2008 at 10:41 »

Quote
Quote
The game wasn't "blacked out" it just wasn't nationally televised.

The game was scheduled to be shown live on FSN Pitt and it was blacked out. I assumed they would only black it out in the Pittsburgh area, where it would also be shown on KDKA. A buddy of mine ordered the sports package for DTV just before kickoff, only to find out the game was blacked out on FSN Pitt. I was watching the FSN pre-game show at the bar and then blacked out when the clock struck 6:30pm.
Yeah, I've complained of this also...from now on, if you are watching on DirecTV, count on DVR'ing the taped rebroadcast of any game that originally airs on FSN Pittsburgh.

Kinda sucks, but, at least you get to see the game.

Another sucky thing is that on NFL Network re-airings, they flip broadcast teams at halftime, so you are stuck with the opponent's homers for a half.  
Logged

"Dreith said I hit Sipe too hard. I hit him as hard as I could. Brian has a chance to go out of bounds and he decides not to. He knows I'm going to hit him. And I do. History."
- - - Jack Lambert, after referee Ben Dreith ejected him from a game for knocking out Browns QB Brian Sipe.
Big Virgil
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 3768
Offline Offline

Posts: 3,253



« Reply #41 on: Aug 22, 2008 at 10:52 »

I can't believe DirecTV determines what station shows the game.  So cable subscribers could wathc the game on FSN Pitt?

Sounds more like NFL Network has the rights to the games.
Logged

Looks like you've been missing a lot of work lately.
I wouldn't say I've been *missing* it, Bob.
Pages: 1 2 ... 5 [All]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal
| Sitemap
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!