Maximum Grilled Steelers Forum
Dec 18, 2014 at 12:26 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
  Home   Forum   Help Calendar Media Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Can we package a deal to move up?  (Read 1502 times)
Preacherman0
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5808
Offline Offline

Posts: 4,869



WWW
« on: Jan 07, 2009 at 12:13 »

Thinking this morning about the sorry state of our offensive line.  Is it possible that we can package up a player w/our poorly-positioned #1 pick to move up and get Oher, or some other olineman who can help us?

Our #1 and FWP:  I love FWP, but we just need linemen so badly that we might have to let him go to get a good one.  Problem is, I'm not sure how many teams feel that he can help them, so that might not be enough.

Our #1 and SH:  We won't re-up Homes, IMO, so why not get something for him?

Those are just a couple of ideas.  I'm just wondering if there is any way that we can move up to get line help without sacrificing a ton of picks.
Logged

We have traded Christ for the religion of Christianity.
msdmnr2002
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 2845
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,749



WWW
« Reply #1 on: Jan 07, 2009 at 12:29 »

This year and next year's #1?  Never happen in a million years, but I think it would be worth it, since it's likely the pick will be later in the first round in '10 also. 

I wouldn't be too concerned about packaging a bundle of picks from this year to move up.  Based on our post-Round 1 success rate over the last 10 years, it's probably worth it.  Worked well to get TP.

After addressing LB, RB lately, we're young and solid in the secondary, WR isn't great but it will do, QB is set, there's really no other positions to address in the draft other than OL and DL.  Would have no problem with bundling our picks and ending up with 2 OL, 2 DL and that's it.

What will the FA market look like?  Must make a good signing there in addition to draft. 
Logged
Merman1983
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5208
Online Online

Posts: 1,592


Master of the figure-four leglock


« Reply #2 on: Jan 07, 2009 at 12:35 »

I like your idea of trading the #1 and a player to move up. Wouldn't trade multiple picks to move up because this team is going to need to take multiple players at positions of need (OT,G,DL) because of the likelyhood of the picks busting. I'm all for trading WP and our #1 if it mean't landing a blue chip OT. This team could be successful with the trio of Mendenhall, MM, and Russell.

Even though I've soured on him, I can't see us trading Holmes. That trade leaves this team dangerously thin at WR. I hope to be competitive next year too while rebuilding the O and D lines, can't see that happening when an injury would mean Washington and Sweed would be 1 and 2, with Dallas Baker or a FA as # 3.

That is unless of course the FO sees Sweed making the typical second year WR jump. They'd know better than I would I guess.

If we can't move up, how about moving down? Picking up an extra 2nd and 3rd along the way somehow? Assuming almost all of our picks went Oline and Dline, it would give us an extra chance to land some 2nd and 3rd round prospects. There have been some very productive lineman to come out of these rounds.

Logged
aj_law
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5539
Online Online

Posts: 15,219


« Reply #3 on: Jan 07, 2009 at 12:45 »

Thinking this morning about the sorry state of our offensive line.  Is it possible that we can package up a player w/our poorly-positioned #1 pick to move up and get Oher, or some other olineman who can help us?

Oh, Holy Jesus, that would be sweet.

Our #1 and FWP:  I love FWP, but we just need linemen so badly that we might have to let him go to get a good one.  Problem is, I'm not sure how many teams feel that he can help them, so that might not be enough.

I had mentioned something to the effect of trading him away for a stud lineman earlier this year, but was really due to the depth behind him.  I still think that Willie (along with #7) has been playing at less than full strength this year.  Give him the offseason to get completely healthy and I think you'll see a RB closer to what you saw before he got injured this year.

Our #1 and SH:  We won't re-up Homes, IMO, so why not get something for him?

As much as his lack of improvement and inconsistency has bothered me this year, I'm not ready to throw out the baby with the bathwater just yet.  I think you let him play out this year and next and hope that a light goes off somewhere along the way.  I'm willing to roll the dice and see if he matures and improves next year.  If so, then they look to extend.  If not, BC'nya.  Honestly, with the depth behind him and Ward's age, I don't think they have any other option.

I think they should do whatever they can to get Oher in B&G.  I watched him against TT in their bowl game and I was very impressed.  He handled speed moves, as well as bull rush moves, extremely well.  I read somewhere that his stock might've slipped lately (mid R1 - 13-21...not sure why) and if that's the case, they definitely need to move up and get it done.  Really, anything outside of top 10...do it.
Logged

We suck because our drafts have been THE SUCK.
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12196
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,400



« Reply #4 on: Jan 07, 2009 at 13:23 »

Given Colbert's track record, I'd say there's about zero chance of these scenarios happening.  No player trades; and no trades into the Oher-zone.

We could move up, say, 8-10 spots, maybe, but I doubt it.  I really think we can get some good talent by sitting tight.  I'm sure we'll all be talking draft in a few weeks, but we could go something like Robinson (OG, Okla.) at the end of R1 (replace Kemo); maybe get a guy like Kropog R2 to groom at LT (though he might need a year, so a FA signing would be necessary); then a guy like Ron Brace (DT, BC) in R3 to groom at NT.

Lots of possibilities, but I don't think we'll see a player trade.
Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
Merman1983
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5208
Online Online

Posts: 1,592


Master of the figure-four leglock


« Reply #5 on: Jan 08, 2009 at 09:08 »

Given Colbert's track record, I'd say there's about zero chance of these scenarios happening.  No player trades; and no trades into the Oher-zone.



Typically I'd agree with you, but before trading up for Troy, wasn't trading up for the Steelers basically unheard of? Our D-back situation was in the shit house and they traded up for who the felt was the best DB in the draft. Subsequently, after 2 straight years of losing WRs, they traded up a few spots for Holmes. Desperate times call for desperate measures.

I think the Oline situation this year is worse than either of those 2 situations. And we're about a year and a half from the Dline situation getting ugly. Wouldn't shock me if they made a few typically uncharacteristic moves this offseason to improve both.
Logged
aj_law
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5539
Online Online

Posts: 15,219


« Reply #6 on: Jan 08, 2009 at 09:16 »

Maybe a FA addition to the DL?

Jonathan Babineau is a UFA, I believe and may not be to 'spensive.  Little on the small~ish side to play DT in a 3-4, but about the right size to play DE.

Just throwin' a name out there.
Logged

We suck because our drafts have been THE SUCK.
Merman1983
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5208
Online Online

Posts: 1,592


Master of the figure-four leglock


« Reply #7 on: Jan 08, 2009 at 09:32 »

Maybe a FA addition to the DL?

Jonathan Babineau is a UFA, I believe and may not be to 'spensive.  Little on the small~ish side to play DT in a 3-4, but about the right size to play DE.

Just throwin' a name out there.

If he's a guy they feel can bulk up to play in the 3-4, I'm all for it. Worked out well for Keisel. I'd be all for bringing in a younger version of Keisel if the price was right.

I do think NT is a huge concern in the next year or 2 (even if Snack further deteriorates Hoke can handle the starting spot at least next year). I think that's going to have to be addressed in the draft where we can get a starter who is not only cheaper, but has alot less wear and tear than any FA NT would. Those guys really get overpaid on the FA market despite how long they've played. Wouldn't surprise me to see Snack get a pretty hefty contract after he's done here.
Logged
aj_law
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 5539
Online Online

Posts: 15,219


« Reply #8 on: Jan 08, 2009 at 11:52 »

Maybe a FA addition to the DL?

Jonathan Babineaux is a UFA, I believe and may not be to 'spensive.  Little on the small~ish side to play DT in a 3-4, but about the right size to play DE.

Just throwin' a name out there.

If he's a guy they feel can bulk up to play in the 3-4, I'm all for it. Worked out well for Keisel. I'd be all for bringing in a younger version of Keisel if the price was right.

Babineaux is around #285, #290.  Perfect 3-4 DE size, IMO.  Big, yet pretty mobile.

Logged

We suck because our drafts have been THE SUCK.
Finnegans Wake
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 12196
Offline Offline

Posts: 22,400



« Reply #9 on: Jan 08, 2009 at 12:14 »

Rumor is that RT Vernon Carey won't be retained by Miami.  IMO, he'd be a guy to get on the cheap to move Colon inside. 
Logged

Out of my mind on Saturday night...
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal
| Sitemap
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!