Maximum Grilled Steelers Forum
Aug 21, 2014 at 21:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
  Home   Forum   Help Calendar Media Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 4 [5]  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: MGS FFL (2011)  (Read 4823 times)
pensodyssey
Halfsharkalligator halfman.
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 8119
Online Online

Posts: 9,696



« Reply #40 on: Dec 05, 2011 at 08:13 »

Not to mention maybe a trade or two. 
Logged

A shabby Charlie Brown.
msdmnr2002
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 2837
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,615



WWW
« Reply #41 on: Dec 05, 2011 at 16:14 »

I'd be cool with that.  If it were an 8 or 10 team league, that many positions would be more viable.  But with the potential to start 3 RBs, there aren't enough starters to go around in a 12 team league.

I'm not enthralled with the defensive players; they rarely make any significant impact.  But it's no big deal keeping them on.
Logged
jonzr
Asst. VP, Jonzring
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 11361
Offline Offline

Posts: 11,404


Have a cup o' joe.


WWW
« Reply #42 on: Dec 05, 2011 at 16:39 »

Proposal:  we get rid of one of the W/R positions and 3 bench positions.

That reduces the potential need for RBs and shortens the bench to prevent hording.  That way you can get by with 1 RB and there are usually plenty of WRs.  Would also consider axing the W/T position if you blood thirsty bastards aren't happy.  These are jobs we're talking about people, jobs!

I like having the defensive players and there's plenty of those to go around.

Logged

"I like David Bowie, he was always my favorite member of Tin Machine."
- Rodney Anonymous

It's a Steeler Nation
pensodyssey
Halfsharkalligator halfman.
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 8119
Online Online

Posts: 9,696



« Reply #43 on: Dec 05, 2011 at 19:43 »

Proposal:  we get rid of one of the W/R positions and 3 bench positions.

That reduces the potential need for RBs and shortens the bench to prevent hording.  That way you can get by with 1 RB and there are usually plenty of WRs.  Would also consider axing the W/T position if you blood thirsty bastards aren't happy.  These are jobs we're talking about people, jobs!

I like having the defensive players and there's plenty of those to go around.



I like having the d players, and I think we should drop one w/r and also the w/t.
Logged

A shabby Charlie Brown.
msdmnr2002
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 2837
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,615



WWW
« Reply #44 on: Dec 05, 2011 at 20:53 »

One W/r position dropped would be OK.  That would give a typical lineup of 3 WRs and 2 RBs.  Usually plenty of WRs to go around, so would be OK.

6 bench slots for 11 starters would probably do.  Backup QB, RB, WR, injured guy you want to hang onto, D/K/defender, and one flex slot.

Shorter bench than that and you may have major turnover on bye weeks.
Logged
Y2Joyce
Global Moderator
Old School Member
*****

Karma: 2549
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,859



« Reply #45 on: Dec 05, 2011 at 22:51 »

I'll let you guys worry about next year whilt my men are singularly focused on the task at hand. December football. The standard is the standard. Unleash hell.
Logged

Steelers 58-15 when I am in attendance.
Pages: 1 ... 4 [5]  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal
| Sitemap
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!