MGS FFL (2011)

[pensodyssey]

Not to mention maybe a trade or two. 

[msdmnr2002]

I'd be cool with that.  If it were an 8 or 10 team league, that many positions would be more viable.  But with the potential to start 3 RBs, there aren't enough starters to go around in a 12 team league.

I'm not enthralled with the defensive players; they rarely make any significant impact.  But it's no big deal keeping them on.

[jonzr]

Proposal:  we get rid of one of the W/R positions and 3 bench positions.

That reduces the potential need for RBs and shortens the bench to prevent hording.  That way you can get by with 1 RB and there are usually plenty of WRs.  Would also consider axing the W/T position if you blood thirsty bastards aren't happy.  These are jobs we're talking about people, jobs!

I like having the defensive players and there's plenty of those to go around.

[pensodyssey]

Proposal:  we get rid of one of the W/R positions and 3 bench positions.

That reduces the potential need for RBs and shortens the bench to prevent hording.  That way you can get by with 1 RB and there are usually plenty of WRs.  Would also consider axing the W/T position if you blood thirsty bastards aren't happy.  These are jobs we're talking about people, jobs!

I like having the defensive players and there's plenty of those to go around.

I like having the d players, and I think we should drop one w/r and also the w/t.

[msdmnr2002]

One W/r position dropped would be OK.  That would give a typical lineup of 3 WRs and 2 RBs.  Usually plenty of WRs to go around, so would be OK.

6 bench slots for 11 starters would probably do.  Backup QB, RB, WR, injured guy you want to hang onto, D/K/defender, and one flex slot.

Shorter bench than that and you may have major turnover on bye weeks.

[Y2Joyce]

I'll let you guys worry about next year whilt my men are singularly focused on the task at hand. December football. The standard is the standard. Unleash hell.